Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs
Kurzinformation
inkl. MwSt. Versandinformationen
Artikel zZt. nicht lieferbar
Artikel zZt. nicht lieferbar

Beschreibung
Is critical argumentation an effective way to overcome disagreement? And does the exchange of arguments bring opponents in a controversy closer to the truth? This study provides a new perspective on these pivotal questions. By means of multi-agent simulations, it investigates the truth and consensus-conduciveness of controversial debates. The book brings together research in formal epistemology and argumentation theory. Aside from its consequences for discursive practice, the work may have important implications for philosophy of science and the way we construe scientific rationality as well. von Betz, Gregor
Produktdetails
So garantieren wir Dir zu jeder Zeit Premiumqualität.
Über den Autor
Gregor Betz is a Junior professor in Philosophy of Science at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. With a background in philosophy, mathematics and political sciences, he has held positions at Universität Stuttgart and Freie Universität Berlin. His research interests span philosophy of science, argumentation theory, applied ethics and the interpretation of classic philosophers.
- paperback
- 45 Seiten
- Erschienen 2008
- Veenman Pub
- Kartoniert
- 288 Seiten
- Erschienen 2020
- Riva
- Klappenbroschur
- 288 Seiten
- Erschienen 2022
- books4success
- Hardcover
- 220 Seiten
- Erschienen 2012
- Verlag Herder
- hardcover
- 506 Seiten
- Erschienen 2011
- The Belknap Press
- Gebunden
- 327 Seiten
- Erschienen 2004
- Springer




